Discussion between me & hacktivists Anonymous: Feminism
- Empress Cynthelestia
- Mar 27, 2018
- 10 min read
On an Anonymous anti-troll service page... (PS: Scroll all the way down for their awesome video.) New post by them popped up on my newsfeed: Anonymous: respect to this young lady !!

(^ the "female" in this picture is allegedly a pretty-looking biological male, the hand holding the notebook may be a giveaway) Empress Cynthelestia making her 1st comment: That is not the point. There are many valid reasons why I am a feminist. Unfollowing. Anonymous admin: Cynthia, it's not men who are the enemy. The Rothschilds, Queen Elizabeth, The Clintons, and many other women who stand behind the United Nations and corrupt globalist agenda are who you should be pointing your aim at. Men in general did nothing to create the problems you're concerned about, the elite ruling class did, and they are comprised of both men and women making it function and operate the way it does to divide and distract people from discovering their involvement in the world's economy and the world's dysfunction. E.C.: There aren't many women in power as much as men. Women have been conditioned to cater to the corrupt wishes and expectations of the patriarchy. Men make up most of the elite ruling class. Most pedophiles, pimps, punters, murderers, misogynists, school shooters, sociopaths, psychopaths, and rapists are men. Anonymous admin: Cynthia, you're right, so why does that mean all men are capable of or even guilty of their same crimes? If Women were in charge and had as much unlimited wealth and power as them they too would be evil, Queen Elizabeth is a woman, Hillary Clinton is a woman, and both of them bask in glory of their evils and the evil that they've turned the other cheek to and never fight with us for. I think instead of calling it a patriarchy or a matriarchy, we just call if for what it is and say power and greed corrupts minds and spoils their life expectations and egos; in both men and women.
E.C.: I'm not saying "all men". I'm saying most men and there are not enough men speaking up against these kind of atrocities in fear of ridicule or what their male buddies would think. Seems as if their ego and penises matter more than anything else. Let's face it, if we had to choose either one, matriarchy or patriarchy, a matriarchy would be better than a patriarchy because of less testosterone = less violence and perversion. Anonymous admin: Queen Elizabeth is involved in the pedophile rings in London, she covers for them and more then likely participates in it too. It's power that has these people behaving this way, not their gender. I can't speak the same for the idiot rapists in the private sector, but I for damn sure will never be prejudice against all men because of the crimes of another. E.C.: Again not "all men". Most men. Anonymous admin: So how come Hillary Clinton and your royal highness is behaving the same way? Lying, perversion, robbing charity funds, killing people overseas for political gain? They have no testosterone... but one thing they have in common with the evil men they work along side with is they have infinite power and wealth... and they were raised around this lifestyle that normalizes pedophilia. I used to support feminism until it stopped fighting for equality and instead wants female dominance. That is not equality, that is one side having more power over another. Equality means exactly what the definition of it means, equal, level, no side bigger or more powerful than the other. A matriarchy implies females will have more of a voice in everything. That is not equality. I can't support something that isn't fair to all people and only fair to the few that started it. E.C.: Hillary Clinton still has her husband, Bill Clinton, (we don't know how much power he has over her behind the scenes). As for Queen Elizabeth, I don't believe she has all the power in the UK. The UK, however, is doing better in regards to taking an official stance against pornography. Feminism originally isn't about equality. It's about liberation from the patriarchy including sexual exploitation and unhealthy gender role expectations. It might take fighting for a matriarchy to create an equilibrium for 100% equality as we have been living in a patriarchy for centuries. Never has there been a matriarchy. We have always lived in a patriarchal planet. Sometimes it takes radical change or a radical pushback in order to create a world change. Anonymous admin: Queen Elizabeth owns most of the land in Australia, Canada, and the U.S. and UK. Rothschild owns 80% of Israel, Hillary is just a pawn and a spoiled brat with no realistic perspective of the real world and how life is like for people like us. Being against identity politics does not mean we hate women or anything though, it just means we see these identities they propped up for us to choose from are divisive tactics to divide us from each other, to argue when we should be talking, to riot when we should be plotting together and uniting against the elite class. It is a way to divert attention away from the root of the problem, and the obvious villains we should be prosecuting and locking away in prison. I love women and I want them to be 100% equal to men, but with no loss to men's rights and no loss to women's rights, but 100% equal. This can be possible once we understand the root of the problem is much more than testosterone, but money, greed, and ego. -An Anonymous admin from another Facebook page enters- Anonymous admin #2 "Never has there been a matriarchy." Cynthia, you might be interested to read this! E.C.: There's a song called, "It's a Man's Man's Man's World". It remains true to this day. Queen Elizabeth and Hillary Clinton are puppets of the patriarchy. They do not hold all the power on the planet. Immorality is the problem but what contributes to that is poor choices mostly coming from men. You don't hear the majority of those committing acts of infidelity, war, rape, massacres, and pedophilia happen to be women. It is mostly men and men need to be aware that they aren't entitled to female bodies and that yes, women are important just as children are. Men need to speak up more for the welfare of women and children. Men need to take better responsibility of their poor actions because if they did, we would have a much better world. Sure there are tribes featuring matriarchy but they don't make up the majority of the world. Compare a society built on the foundations of matriarchy compared to patriarchy. Which one is faring off better? Which one has less violence and less sexual exploitation? In those tribes featuring matriarchy, the men still govern politically. Still a man's world. Anonymous admin: this video displays the danger zone of how a peaceful group can turn extreme, and if this were granted supreme power and the wrong kind of women infiltrated it in the future, this is what kind of mind could be in charge of everything - and has nothing to do with testosterone Anonymous admin #2: Anonymous admin, agreed, minus the Donald Trump tribute in the end, I hate that guy too. But see her attitude? That is parallel with what Nazi indoctrination over Germany was like in its early stages. If that ever resurfaced or if it took hold now in large numbers, we would witness a new type of fascism under the rule of women. Power corrupts, it does not matter what sex or gender role the powerful assume, power alone is what makes people behave so violently in order to preserve it and keep their hands on the control. Anonymous admin: Yes, I was referencing the beginning part not the ending. I wanted Cynthia to see that women feminists can also be equally as sinister in their policies if they held power. Imagine if this lady ran for office and put on a fake smile and won the popular vote and became a Trojan horse take over in a matriarch centered society. Cynthia, would you still follow her orders if she were your president and ordered you to kill your first born male child or else have him taken away from you for the sake of protecting the matriarchy from ever landing in the hands of men ever again? Or would you resist her dictatorship and finally see our side of why we foresaw these types of characters arising, and that sex has little to do with anything related to the violent ways dictators behave in order to lock their seat of power in place and stop themselves from being overthrown by the people? This is an honest question. Anonymous admin #2: It's sad to me, because before civilization existed, men and women from the stone age once worked beautifully and harmoniously together as a team and held the family tribes together without the need of government to keep the order. Now the mentality is "us versus THEM", when it shouldn't be, because our species completely relies on both sex's ability to cooperate in order to hold our birth rate numbers high enough from going extinct. Fewer and fewer people are having children these days anymore, it's not the way it's supposed to be. E.C.: Women may speak violently when upset but very rarely would they actually commit the same violence that comes out of their mouths while enraged by injustice from the patriarchy. Can't say the same for men though. Yes there are lesbian radical feminists who completely hate all men but they are in the minority and neither do I completely agree with them. Never have I heard of a lesbian radical feminist who has murdered anyone for the sake of power or caused a massacre though. Also, even though I'm a feminist (specifically an anti-porn feminist who supports radical/"root" feminism), I strongly hold some family values and appreciate chivalry. Males today have become more openly perverted, pathetic, and have less respect for girls and women than they used to. This has got to change. We're on board with many of the same things but unfortunately there is a lack of understanding in regards to feminism. Feminism has been hijacked. The feminism you're speaking of is mostly liberal "feminism" (mainstream feminism) and yes it is harming our society including women and children's wellbeing. Liberal "feminism" is a reason why sexual exploitation still exists and why there are more than 100 different genders now (mind you, gender is a social construct/hierarchy to further divide the people). I recommend reading this book in regards to this faux "feminism" we have today and how it's damaging our families and society. I also recommend checking out this in-depth article on an educational institute that's to blame. Would like to add that so as long as we continually live in a patriarchal society operating on a patriarchal hierarchal system, there will never be true equality. Anonymous admin: Cynthia, very very interesting conversation.... Based on your first comment with the article link, we have more in common than you thought. I agree with that definition of feminism you gave it, that was the classical way the movement carried itself in its origins almost a century ago. Unfortunately, it has been taken over by the radical lesbians and trans men who made it about them now. The coined word 'Feminazi' wasn't tagged on neo-femisism for nothing, it is because the new form of it is not saying the things you just stated there anymore, it calls for extreme ideas now that aren't very well thought out, the whole gender pronoun thing and non-sexing of all newborn children and opening bathrooms to all sexes - to name but a few. I would support it if it didn't sandwich in all the extreme views and masculine women who want to take over men with the same exact use of violence that they ridicule men for. Now, I will give you the benefit of the debate that there are no "absolutes" when predicting the future, but I will still tell you my predictions just to put it out there. So here it goes, I predict if women took over it would start off very good, wars would end, negotiations would be the center focus of conflict, and perhaps men would be taught in school at an early age how to suppress their natural urges to be alpha types and to submit themselves for the greater good of all.. but... as time continues, you will eventually see groups of men who hate being feminized, and feel it is their right to express their dominant and alpha nature that all men are naturally born with. This presents a problem, because the leaders of the matriarchy will now begin to fear that if more and more men are free to express these types of feelings they will gang together and try to overthrow the matriarchy and upset the peace they've worked so hard to install... this is when they will begin to make laws and policies limiting a man to express these feelings, more than likely guns and weapons will already be banned by this stage but violent video games and movies will be banned next now so that this way of thinking and attitude will not have room to grow.... this will make everyone angry, both men and women who enjoyed those things but held it responsibly without acting out those actions they saw in their favorite movies. All movies will be chick flicks and anti violence and absent of the other range of spectrum of human emotions such as rage, suspense, fear and competition, both men and women would not be satisfied or entertained with this change. As this stirs society up, tom boy women, dom lesbians, and men who WANT to express their alpha personalities will begin to ban together, possibly even arm themselves with self made weapons of their very own making, and now the matriarchy has an uprising to deal with.... will they A.) kill them or imprison them? B.)allow them to continue feeling in charge and grow in number more C.) allow them seats of power and risk letting the 'all female dominated matriarchy' slip between the cracks of their hands and turn BACK into what it used to be? That's a pretty tough decision... because if they choose A. then they are no better than the woman I just showed you in that video... and they would be no better than the men before them who ALSO faced this same dilemma in our time era and had to choose option A. in order to hold a strong grip on their seat of power... now history repeats... because if they choose A. in order to secure the matriarchy, then they will have no choice but to kill every person who displays masculine and alpha traits and voices over their rule. That can either happen naturally all on its own, or, it can happen via infiltration, like what Hitler did. This is what i meant when i said power corrupts... it forces you to have to do evil things in order to preserve it from falling apart, and whether it is men or women in power, it will always put that awful fate in the hands of the person at the throne, because this is the consequence from attempting to control a giant mass of people who do not want to be controlled, you will inevitably face resistance and disobedience - which forces you to make unnatural decisions of how to control that from happening, and in this case, it would have to be forcing men to be feminine or else face the consequences... ~*~ Food for thought. Reason why I liked and followed that Anonymous patroll page (pun intended) because I like this video they posted.